Staydium Financial Model — DCF · Scenarios · Investor Returns

Unit Economics

CAC, LTV, payback, and contribution margin per school and per slot

Scenario
Y1 CAC
-
0 new schools · S&M 476,295
Y1 LTV / School
$1,759,301
20.0yr retention × 40% GM
LTV / CAC (Y1)
0.0x
Target ≥ 3.0x
Payback (Y1)
0.0 mo
Months to recover CAC
Cohort & Unit Economics
FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Scale
Total Schools (EoY)
New Schools Signed-17201714
Acquisition Cost
S&M Spend476,295603,834786,686790,974814,704
CAC (S&M ÷ New Schools)-35,52039,33446,52858,193
Value per School
Revenue / School220,318215,422211,011217,929232,965
Gross Margin39.9%43.7%47.3%50.7%53.8%
Contribution / School87,96594,24699,869110,448125,380
LTV / School (× 20.0yr retention)1,759,3011,884,9121,997,3832,208,9622,507,602
Efficiency Ratios
LTV / CAC0.0x53.1x50.8x47.5x43.1x
Payback (months)0.0x4.5x4.7x5.1x5.6x
Per-Slot Contribution
Slots Available45,00050,00055,00060,00065,000
Contribution / Slot133160191225262
Methodology
  • CAC = total S&M spend ÷ new schools signed in the year. Includes salaried BD headcount allocated to S&M plus marketing opex.
  • LTV = (revenue per school × gross margin) × retention years. Retention derived from renewal rate: 1 / (1 − renewal).
  • Payback = CAC ÷ monthly contribution per school. Target < 18 months for enterprise-motion SaaS.
  • Contribution per slot spreads school-level economics across the annual placement base — useful for capacity investment decisions.